# chorus-memory eval — current-version metrics harness A reproducible, credential-free eval of the shipped plugin against the deterministic mock REST API. `run_eval.py` measures the four things the plugin claims (results print as a table and land in `results/latest.json`): 1. **Retrieval** — hybrid recall (BM25 over entities **and** sessions/journal, fused with freshness/status priors) vs a keyword-only baseline modeling pre-1.5 recall (per-word substring ranking over entity notes only). Precision@5 / recall@5 / MRR, session/journal answerability, freshness top-1. 2. **Dedup** — duplicate notes created replaying a capture stream with the pre-write gate ON (default) vs OFF (`CHORUS_DUP_GATE=99` ≈ pre-1.5 warn-only), plus legitimate captures wrongly blocked (must be 0). 3. **Write safety** — silent write failures under fault injection (transient 503, phantom PUT, PATCH to a missing heading, replayed append). Must be 0; must be loud. 4. **Durability** — writes during an outage queue, replay exactly once, never duplicate on re-flush. > The original **0.6-vs-0.7 A/B harness** (token cost + silent-failure comparison that > motivated the 0.7 client) lives in git history — `git log -- eval/run_eval.py`. ## Current test suites (run these for any change) The A/B harness below is the historical 0.6-vs-0.7 comparison. The **current-version** suites live alongside it and are what CI gates on: ```bash python3 test_features.py # end-to-end features vs the mock (capture/recall/gate/triage/hooks/…) python3 test_reflect.py # reflection pipeline python3 test_offline_queue.py # H2 outage queue + read cache python3 test_patch_semantics.py # real PATCH semantics vs mock_olrapi_hifi.py (incl. fm create-or-replace) python3 test_multimember.py # 26-check two-member group lifecycle (bootstrap → self-onboard → attributed writes) # plus, in the plugin tree: scripts/test_chorus_client.py (offline unit + routing-sync guard) ``` ## Run it (historical A/B) ```bash cd eval python3 run_eval.py # default params python3 run_eval.py --recovery 2500 # sensitivity-test the recovery assumption python3 run_eval.py --cpt 3.5 # different chars/token proxy ``` No network, no API key, no live vault. Pure stdlib Python 3 (the shipped client is now Python — no bash required). Results table prints to stdout and a machine-readable copy lands in `results/latest.json`. ## How it works - **`mock_olrapi.py`** — a deterministic mock of the Obsidian Local REST API surface the plugin uses, reproducing its real behaviors and quirks (404 shape, the `/vault//` double-slash 400, directory listings with `dir/` entries, `PATCH` heading targets that return `400 invalid-target / 40080` when the heading is absent). Faults are triggered by path markers so one server serves every scenario: - `flaky` in the path → first write returns `503`, then succeeds (tests retry). - `phantom` in the path → `PUT` returns `200` but does **not** persist (tests read-back verify). - a `PATCH` to a missing heading → `400` (the silent-write-loss trigger). - **`run_eval.py`** — for each scenario, runs both methods against a freshly reset + re-seeded server (so faults are identical for both), then reads ground truth back **independently** from the mock. The 0.7 side executes the *actual shipped `chorus.py`*; the 0.6 side faithfully models the documented recipe (real HTTP, but no status check, no retry, no verify, no dedupe). ## Metrics | metric | meaning | |---|---| | `gen_tokens` | output tokens the model must generate for the op (`len(emitted)/cpt` proxy) | | `silent_failure` | method **reported success** but ground truth is wrong (lost write or dup) — and nobody noticed | | `detected` | the method surfaced the failure (nonzero exit) instead of hiding it | | `effective_tokens` | `gen + silent_failures*recovery + detected*detect_cost` | | `silent-error-free ops` | the headline accuracy number | | `writes actually persisted` | did the single op land (separate from "was it silent") | ## Scenarios 1. **agent-log-missing-heading** — `PATCH` append to a note lacking the target heading (`400`). 2. **scope-switch** — clean `PATCH replace` (no fault; pure token comparison). 3. **inbox-capture-replayed** — same capture issued twice (retry/replay): dedup vs duplicate. 4. **session-log-flaky-network** — one-time `503`: retry vs single-shot. 5. **heartbeat-phantom-write** — accepted-but-not-persisted: read-back verify vs none. 6. **cold-start-load-6-reads** — 6 GETs (no fault; pure token comparison). ## Representative result (defaults) ``` generated tokens 723 -> 174 (+76% fewer) silent failures 4 -> 0 (-4) duplicate lines 1 -> 0 (-1) silent-error-free ops 1/5 -> 5/5 effective tokens (assumed) 6723 -> 334 ``` ## Honest caveats - **Mechanics, not reasoning.** This measures the deterministic plumbing differences. It does **not** measure model judgment (routing choices, prose quality) — that needs a live model. - **`recovery` and `detect-cost` are assumptions**, not measurements. The headline "silent failures: 4 → 0" is a hard count from ground truth; the `effective_tokens` figure is a model on top of it — tune `--recovery` to see the sensitivity. - **`gen_tokens` is a `chars/cpt` proxy** for the I/O layer only, not a tokenizer count, and excludes the one-time `+12%` SKILL.md context cost noted in the analysis (that's a per-session context cost, not per-op). ## Extending to a live-model run (optional) To measure real model behavior and true token counts: 1. Define the same six scenarios as natural-language tasks (e.g. "log a session note for X"). 2. Run each twice — once with the 0.6 skill files, once with 0.7 — through the Agent SDK against the **mock** server (point `CHORUS_BASE` at it) so faults stay deterministic. 3. Record `usage.output_tokens` per task from the API and whether the vault ended correct (same ground-truth read used here). The mock + ground-truth checks in this harness are reusable as-is for that; only the driver changes from "scripted ops" to "model-driven ops".