6509071b8e93919bb1f21dd625457fbf3a59ed5e
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
6509071b8e |
feat(searcher): add candidate_strategy="union" for vector∪BM25 reranking pool
Default search behavior is unchanged. Opt-in candidate_strategy="union"
also pulls top-K BM25-only candidates from sqlite FTS5 and merges them
into the rerank pool, catching docs with strong BM25 signal that the
vector index didn't surface in the over-fetch window.
Motivation
----------
The current hybrid path gathers candidates from the vector index only
(n_results * 3 over-fetch), then BM25-reranks within them. When the
query embeds close to the wrong content semantically, the right doc
never enters the rerank pool — *no matter how wide the over-fetch*.
Tested on a ~6K-document mixed corpus (knowledge prose + short structured
records): at *30x* over-fetch (~5% of the corpus) the target doc still
didn't surface for narrative-shaped queries targeting terminology guides.
Wider over-fetch isn't the answer; widening the pool's *source* is.
Concrete failure mode: a narrative-shaped query embeds close to records
sharing the same operational vocabulary (other narrative entries in the
corpus). A terminology / style guide is BM25-strong for the query
(rare keywords the guide repeats) but vector-distant. Vector-only
candidates don't include it; BM25 never gets to rerank it. The hybrid
path produces 0.00 recall on a probe that pure BM25 alone scores 1.00 —
the hybrid is worse than its component on the same input.
Behavior change
---------------
* New parameter ``candidate_strategy: str = "vector"`` on ``search_memories``.
- ``"vector"`` (default): historical behavior, no change.
- ``"union"``: also fetch top ``n_results * 3`` candidates via the
existing ``_bm25_only_via_sqlite`` helper, dedupe by source_file,
merge into the rerank pool. BM25-only candidates carry
``distance=None`` so they're scored on BM25 contribution alone
(vec_sim coerces to 0).
* ``_hybrid_rank`` now handles ``distance=None`` explicitly, scoring
such candidates as vector-unknown (vec_sim=0) rather than treating
it as max-distance via shim.
* New strategies register via ``_CANDIDATE_MERGERS``; dispatch is in
``_apply_candidate_strategy`` so ``search_memories`` stays under the
C901 complexity ceiling.
Bench numbers (~6K-doc internal mixed corpus, recall@10, 5 probes spanning
policy-exception lookup, temporal-decay, style retrieval, set-difference,
and pattern-recognition):
baseline ("vector") "union"
policy-exception probe 0.00 0.50 +0.50
temporal-decay probe 0.17 0.50 +0.33
style-retrieval probe 0.00 1.00 +1.00 (PASSES)
set-difference probe 0.00–0.06 0.06–0.09 ~
pattern-recog probe 0.64 (stable) 0.50–0.71 variance, typ. +0.07
macro recall 0.16–0.17 0.51–0.56 +0.34 to +0.40
The pattern-recog variance points at a related issue worth a separate PR:
``_hybrid_rank`` computes BM25 IDF over the candidate set. Adding new
candidates re-normalizes BM25 for *existing* candidates non-monotonically.
Stable corpus-wide BM25 would remove this. Out of scope here.
Tests
-----
``tests/test_hybrid_candidate_union.py`` (6 tests, all pass):
- default behavior unchanged (explicit ``"vector"`` matches default)
- ``"union"`` surfaces a BM25-strong vector-distant doc
- ``"union"`` doesn't drop docs ``"vector"`` would have found
- empty-palace handling
- invalid ``candidate_strategy`` raises
- ``_hybrid_rank`` tolerates ``distance=None``
Existing ``test_hybrid_search.py`` (5) and ``test_searcher.py`` (27) pass.
Performance note
----------------
Each ``"union"`` query adds one sqlite open + FTS5 MATCH + metadata
fetch (via the existing ``_bm25_only_via_sqlite`` helper, which already
runs as the ``vector_disabled`` fallback path so the code is
well-trodden). Per-query overhead is small but unmeasured at corpus
scale. Default stays ``"vector"`` until a maintainer characterizes the
cost.
|