jp 0c38deaab5 feat(backends): quarantine_stale_hnsw — recover from HNSW/sqlite drift
Add a helper that renames HNSW segment directories whose
`data_level0.bin` is significantly older than `chroma.sqlite3`. Drift
between the on-disk HNSW graph and the live embeddings table is the
root cause of a segfault class where the Rust graph-walk dereferences
dangling neighbor pointers for entries in the metadata segment that no
longer exist in the HNSW index, crashing in a background thread on
`count()` or `query()`.

Issue #823 describes the same drift as a silent-staleness symptom
(semantic search returns stale results after `add_drawer` because
`data_level0.bin` lags the sqlite metadata under the default
`sync_threshold=1000`). Under heavier load or after an interrupted
write, the same drift can escalate from "silent stale results" to
"SIGSEGV on next open," which is the failure mode observed at
neo-cortex-mcp#2 (chromadb 1.5.5, Python 3.12) and acknowledged at
chroma-core/chroma#2594.

On one 135K-drawer palace where `index_metadata.pickle` claimed 137,813
elements against 135,464 rows in sqlite (2,349-entry drift), fresh
Python processes crashed in `col.count()` 17/20 times; after renaming
the segment dir out of the way and letting ChromaDB rebuild lazily, the
same 20-run check went to 0 crashes.

The recovery path #823 suggests (export / recreate / reimport) is heavy
— it re-embeds every drawer. This helper is lighter: rename the segment
dir so ChromaDB reopens without it, and the indexer rebuilds lazily on
the next write. The original directory is renamed (not deleted) so the
operator can recover if the heuristic misfires.

If `chroma.sqlite3` is more than `stale_seconds` (default 3600) newer
than the segment's `data_level0.bin`, the segment is considered
suspect. One hour is deliberately conservative — normal HNSW flush
cadence is seconds to minutes, so an hour of drift implies a crashed
mid-write, not routine lag.

- Additive: exposes `quarantine_stale_hnsw(palace_path, stale_seconds)`
  as a helper. Not wired into `_client()` / startup on this PR — the
  goal is to land the primitive first so operators and higher layers
  can opt in. A follow-up could call it automatically on palace open
  behind an env var or config flag.
- Closes #823 by giving operators a first-class recovery path without
  having to install `chromadb-ops` or re-mine.

Four new tests in `tests/test_backends.py`:
- renames drifted segment, preserves original files under `.drift-TS` suffix
- leaves fresh segments alone
- no-op on missing palace path / missing `chroma.sqlite3`
- skips already-quarantined (`.drift-` suffixed) directories

`pytest tests/test_backends.py` → 11 passed. `ruff check` / `ruff format
--check` — clean.
2026-04-18 18:04:05 -07:00
2026-04-16 21:46:03 -03:00
2026-04-17 19:40:25 -03:00

Caution

Scam alert. The only official sources for MemPalace are this GitHub repository, the PyPI package, and the docs site at mempalaceofficial.com. Any other domain — including mempalace.tech — is an impostor and may distribute malware. Details and timeline: docs/HISTORY.md.

MemPalace

MemPalace

Local-first AI memory. Verbatim storage, pluggable backend, 96.6% R@5 raw on LongMemEval — zero API calls.


What it is

MemPalace stores your conversation history as verbatim text and retrieves it with semantic search. It does not summarize, extract, or paraphrase. The index is structured — people and projects become wings, topics become rooms, and original content lives in drawers — so searches can be scoped rather than run against a flat corpus.

The retrieval layer is pluggable. The current default is ChromaDB; the interface is defined in mempalace/backends/base.py and alternative backends can be dropped in without touching the rest of the system.

Nothing leaves your machine unless you opt in.

Architecture, concepts, and mining flows: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/the-palace.


Install

pip install mempalace
mempalace init ~/projects/myapp

Quickstart

# Mine content into the palace
mempalace mine ~/projects/myapp                    # project files
mempalace mine ~/.claude/projects/ --mode convos   # Claude Code sessions (scope with --wing per project)

# Search
mempalace search "why did we switch to GraphQL"

# Load context for a new session
mempalace wake-up

For Claude Code, Gemini CLI, MCP-compatible tools, and local models, see mempalaceofficial.com/guide/getting-started.


Benchmarks

All numbers below are reproducible from this repository with the commands in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md. Full per-question result files are committed under benchmarks/results_*.

LongMemEval — retrieval recall (R@5, 500 questions):

Mode R@5 LLM required
Raw (semantic search, no heuristics, no LLM) 96.6% None
Hybrid v4, held-out 450q (tuned on 50 dev, not seen during training) 98.4% None
Hybrid v4 + LLM rerank (full 500) ≥99% Any capable model

The raw 96.6% requires no API key, no cloud, and no LLM at any stage. The hybrid pipeline adds keyword boosting, temporal-proximity boosting, and preference-pattern extraction; the held-out 98.4% is the honest generalisable figure.

The rerank pipeline promotes the best candidate out of the top-20 retrieved sessions using an LLM reader. It works with any reasonably capable model — we have reproduced it with Claude Haiku, Claude Sonnet, and minimax-m2.7 via Ollama Cloud (no Anthropic dependency). The gap between raw and reranked is model-agnostic; we do not headline a "100%" number because the last 0.6% was reached by inspecting specific wrong answers, which benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md flags as teaching to the test.

Other benchmarks (full results in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md):

Benchmark Metric Score Notes
LoCoMo (session, top-10, no rerank) R@10 60.3% 1,986 questions
LoCoMo (hybrid v5, top-10, no rerank) R@10 88.9% Same set
ConvoMem (all categories, 250 items) Avg recall 92.9% 50 per category
MemBench (ACL 2025, 8,500 items) R@5 80.3% All categories

We deliberately do not include a side-by-side comparison against Mem0, Mastra, Hindsight, Supermemory, or Zep. Those projects publish different metrics on different splits, and placing retrieval recall next to end-to-end QA accuracy is not an honest comparison. See each project's own research page for their published numbers.

Reproducing every result:

git clone https://github.com/MemPalace/mempalace.git
cd mempalace
pip install -e ".[dev]"
# see benchmarks/README.md for dataset download commands
python benchmarks/longmemeval_bench.py /path/to/longmemeval_s_cleaned.json

Knowledge graph

MemPalace includes a temporal entity-relationship graph with validity windows — add, query, invalidate, timeline — backed by local SQLite. Usage and tool reference: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/knowledge-graph.

MCP server

29 MCP tools cover palace reads/writes, knowledge-graph operations, cross-wing navigation, drawer management, and agent diaries. Installation and the full tool list: mempalaceofficial.com/reference/mcp-tools.

Agents

Each specialist agent gets its own wing and diary in the palace. Discoverable at runtime via mempalace_list_agents — no bloat in your system prompt: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/agents.

Auto-save hooks

Two Claude Code hooks save periodically and before context compression: mempalaceofficial.com/guide/hooks.


Requirements

  • Python 3.9+
  • A vector-store backend (ChromaDB by default)
  • ~300 MB disk for the default embedding model

No API key is required for the core benchmark path.

Docs

Contributing

PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.

S
Description
Server-mode fork of MemPalace — shared Docker container on Unraid so Claude Code, Codex, and MCP clients can share one persistent AI memory palace over LAN
Readme MIT 17 MiB
Languages
Python 99.2%
Shell 0.7%