Igor Lins e Silva
4631d6a7db
The init step's output was a dead file. miner.py has always read
`~/.mempalace/known_entities.json` to tag drawer metadata with
recognized names, but nothing ever wrote it — so init's careful
manifest + git + LLM detection work stopped at `<project>/entities.json`
and never reached the path that actually uses it.
Measured delta on a representative prose snippet (eight sentences
mentioning six real people and four real projects):
- Empty registry: 0 entities recognized (multi-word names fail the
frequency threshold; lowercase/hyphenated project names don't match
the CamelCase regex).
- Registry populated by init: 12 entities recognized (all correct, zero
false positives).
Every recognized name becomes a semicolon-separated metadata tag on the
drawer, which ChromaDB uses for entity-filtered search.
Implementation:
- `miner.add_to_known_entities({category: [names]})` reads the existing
registry, unions each category (case-insensitively, preserving first-
seen casing), and writes back. The function is tolerant of the two
on-disk shapes miner already supports: list of names, or dict mapping
name → code (dialect-style). In the dict case new names are added as
keys with `None` values so existing codes aren't overwritten.
- Invalidates the in-process mtime cache so same-process callers
(`cmd_init` → `cmd_mine` in one run) see the write immediately.
- Writes with `ensure_ascii=False` so non-ASCII names (Gergő Móricz,
Arturo Domínguez, etc.) stay readable on disk.
- Chmods 0o600 — the registry mirrors confirm-step PII from the user's
git authors and local paths.
cmd_init now calls this at the end of the confirm-entities step, after
the per-project `entities.json` is written (which is kept as an audit
trail the user can inspect or hand-edit). The per-project file is still
excluded from mining via `SKIP_FILENAMES` from the earlier fix.
17 new tests cover: fresh-file creation, list-category union, case-
insensitive dedup, preservation of untouched categories, dict-format
registries, malformed/non-dict file recovery, cache invalidation,
unicode round-trip, and an end-to-end verification that the miner's
`_extract_entities_for_metadata` picks up every registered name.
Caution
Scam alert. The only official sources for MemPalace are this GitHub repository, the PyPI package, and the docs site at mempalaceofficial.com. Any other domain — including
mempalace.tech— is an impostor and may distribute malware. Details and timeline: docs/HISTORY.md.
MemPalace
Local-first AI memory. Verbatim storage, pluggable backend, 96.6% R@5 raw on LongMemEval — zero API calls.
What it is
MemPalace stores your conversation history as verbatim text and retrieves it with semantic search. It does not summarize, extract, or paraphrase. The index is structured — people and projects become wings, topics become rooms, and original content lives in drawers — so searches can be scoped rather than run against a flat corpus.
The retrieval layer is pluggable. The current default is ChromaDB; the
interface is defined in mempalace/backends/base.py
and alternative backends can be dropped in without touching the rest of
the system.
Nothing leaves your machine unless you opt in.
Architecture, concepts, and mining flows: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/the-palace.
Install
pip install mempalace
mempalace init ~/projects/myapp
Quickstart
# Mine content into the palace
mempalace mine ~/projects/myapp # project files
mempalace mine ~/.claude/projects/ --mode convos # Claude Code sessions (scope with --wing per project)
# Search
mempalace search "why did we switch to GraphQL"
# Load context for a new session
mempalace wake-up
For Claude Code, Gemini CLI, MCP-compatible tools, and local models, see mempalaceofficial.com/guide/getting-started.
Benchmarks
All numbers below are reproducible from this repository with the commands
in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md. Full
per-question result files are committed under benchmarks/results_*.
LongMemEval — retrieval recall (R@5, 500 questions):
| Mode | R@5 | LLM required |
|---|---|---|
| Raw (semantic search, no heuristics, no LLM) | 96.6% | None |
| Hybrid v4, held-out 450q (tuned on 50 dev, not seen during training) | 98.4% | None |
| Hybrid v4 + LLM rerank (full 500) | ≥99% | Any capable model |
The raw 96.6% requires no API key, no cloud, and no LLM at any stage. The hybrid pipeline adds keyword boosting, temporal-proximity boosting, and preference-pattern extraction; the held-out 98.4% is the honest generalisable figure.
The rerank pipeline promotes the best candidate out of the top-20
retrieved sessions using an LLM reader. It works with any reasonably
capable model — we have reproduced it with Claude Haiku, Claude Sonnet,
and minimax-m2.7 via Ollama Cloud (no Anthropic dependency). The gap
between raw and reranked is model-agnostic; we do not headline a "100%"
number because the last 0.6% was reached by inspecting specific wrong
answers, which benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md flags as teaching to the test.
Other benchmarks (full results in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md):
| Benchmark | Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| LoCoMo (session, top-10, no rerank) | R@10 | 60.3% | 1,986 questions |
| LoCoMo (hybrid v5, top-10, no rerank) | R@10 | 88.9% | Same set |
| ConvoMem (all categories, 250 items) | Avg recall | 92.9% | 50 per category |
| MemBench (ACL 2025, 8,500 items) | R@5 | 80.3% | All categories |
We deliberately do not include a side-by-side comparison against Mem0, Mastra, Hindsight, Supermemory, or Zep. Those projects publish different metrics on different splits, and placing retrieval recall next to end-to-end QA accuracy is not an honest comparison. See each project's own research page for their published numbers.
Reproducing every result:
git clone https://github.com/MemPalace/mempalace.git
cd mempalace
pip install -e ".[dev]"
# see benchmarks/README.md for dataset download commands
python benchmarks/longmemeval_bench.py /path/to/longmemeval_s_cleaned.json
Knowledge graph
MemPalace includes a temporal entity-relationship graph with validity windows — add, query, invalidate, timeline — backed by local SQLite. Usage and tool reference: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/knowledge-graph.
MCP server
29 MCP tools cover palace reads/writes, knowledge-graph operations, cross-wing navigation, drawer management, and agent diaries. Installation and the full tool list: mempalaceofficial.com/reference/mcp-tools.
Agents
Each specialist agent gets its own wing and diary in the palace.
Discoverable at runtime via mempalace_list_agents — no bloat in your
system prompt:
mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/agents.
Auto-save hooks
Two Claude Code hooks save periodically and before context compression: mempalaceofficial.com/guide/hooks.
Requirements
- Python 3.9+
- A vector-store backend (ChromaDB by default)
- ~300 MB disk for the default embedding model
No API key is required for the core benchmark path.
Docs
- Getting started → mempalaceofficial.com/guide/getting-started
- CLI reference → mempalaceofficial.com/reference/cli
- Python API → mempalaceofficial.com/reference/python-api
- Full benchmark methodology → benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md
- Release notes → CHANGELOG.md
- Corrections and public notices → docs/HISTORY.md
Contributing
PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.