Files
mempalace/website/concepts/knowledge-graph.md
T
Igor Lins e Silva f20a1a30fe docs(website): align mempalaceofficial.com with honest benchmarks
Part of #875. Bring the VitePress site into line with the new README
and the reproducibility scorecard: drop category-error comparisons,
drop retracted claims, retain only metrics and caveats that survive
audit.

website/index.md
 - New tagline matches README (local-first, verbatim, pluggable backend,
   96.6% R@5 raw, zero API calls).
 - Replace the "MemPalace hybrid 100% / Supermemory ~99% / Mastra
   94.87% / Mem0 ~85%" comparison table with a single honest table
   showing MemPalace's own retrieval-recall numbers (raw 96.6%,
   hybrid v4 held-out 98.4%). Add an explicit sentence explaining why
   we no longer publish a cross-system table on the landing page
   (retrieval recall vs QA accuracy are different metrics).
 - Soften the "ChromaDB-powered vector search" feature blurb to be
   backend-agnostic, since the retrieval layer is pluggable.

website/reference/benchmarks.md
 - Full rewrite of the retrieval-recall tables. No more "100%"
   headline; honest held-out 98.4% R@5 replaces it. Added the
   model-agnostic rerank result (99.2% R@5 / 100% R@10 with
   minimax-m2.7 via Ollama) to show the pipeline is not Haiku-specific.
 - Drop the LoCoMo "Hybrid v5 + Sonnet rerank (top-50) 100%" row.
   With per-conversation session counts of 19-32 and top_k=50, the
   retrieval stage returns every session by construction — the number
   measures an LLM's reading comprehension, not retrieval.
 - Drop the cross-system comparison tables. Link out to each project's
   own research page (Mastra, Mem0, Supermemory) for their published
   numbers and metric definitions.
 - Rewrite reproduction commands to use the correct repository and
   demonstrate the new --llm-backend ollama flag.

website/concepts/the-palace.md
 - Remove the "+34%" row / paragraph. Wing/room filtering is standard
   metadata filtering in the vector store, not a novel retrieval
   mechanism — the April-7 note already retracted that framing; this
   finishes the retraction on the website where it had remained.

website/guide/searching.md
 - Same treatment for "34% retrieval improvement". Reframe as
   operational scoping, not a novel boost.

website/reference/contributing.md
 - Update the "palace structure matters" bullet to reflect the same
   framing: scoping-not-magic.

website/concepts/knowledge-graph.md
 - Replace the MemPalace-vs-Zep feature matrix with a short "related
   work" note that links to Zep's own documentation for authoritative
   details on their deployment model. Avoids claims we cannot verify
   at source.
2026-04-14 21:37:45 -03:00

91 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown

# Knowledge Graph
MemPalace includes a temporal entity-relationship graph — like Zep's Graphiti, but SQLite instead of Neo4j. Local and free.
## What It Stores
Entity-relationship triples with temporal validity:
```
Subject → Predicate → Object [valid_from → valid_to]
```
Facts have time windows. When something stops being true, you invalidate it — and historical queries still find it.
## Usage
### Python API
```python
from mempalace.knowledge_graph import KnowledgeGraph
kg = KnowledgeGraph()
# Add facts
kg.add_triple("Kai", "works_on", "Orion", valid_from="2025-06-01")
kg.add_triple("Maya", "assigned_to", "auth-migration", valid_from="2026-01-15")
kg.add_triple("Maya", "completed", "auth-migration", valid_from="2026-02-01")
# Query: everything about Kai
kg.query_entity("Kai")
# → [Kai → works_on → Orion (current), Kai → recommended → Clerk (2026-01)]
# Query: what was true in January?
kg.query_entity("Maya", as_of="2026-01-20")
# → [Maya → assigned_to → auth-migration (active)]
# Timeline
kg.timeline("Orion")
# → chronological story of the project
```
### Invalidating Facts
When something stops being true:
```python
kg.invalidate("Kai", "works_on", "Orion", ended="2026-03-01")
```
Now queries for Kai's current work won't return Orion. Historical queries still will.
### MCP Tools
Through the MCP server, the knowledge graph is available as tools:
| Tool | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `mempalace_kg_query` | Query entity relationships with time filtering |
| `mempalace_kg_add` | Add facts |
| `mempalace_kg_invalidate` | Mark facts as ended |
| `mempalace_kg_timeline` | Chronological entity story |
| `mempalace_kg_stats` | Graph overview |
## Storage
The knowledge graph uses SQLite with two tables:
**`entities`** — people, projects, tools, concepts:
- `id` — lowercase normalized name
- `name` — display name
- `type` — person, project, tool, concept, etc.
- `properties` — JSON blob for extra metadata
**`triples`** — relationships between entities:
- `subject``predicate``object`
- `valid_from` — when this became true
- `valid_to` — when it stopped being true (NULL = still current)
- `confidence` — 0.0 to 1.0
- `source_closet` — link back to the verbatim memory
Database location: `~/.mempalace/knowledge_graph.sqlite3`
## Related Work
Temporal entity-relationship graphs are a familiar pattern — Zep's
Graphiti, for example, also exposes a bi-temporal model. MemPalace's
knowledge graph is local-first (SQLite, everything on disk) and free;
Zep is a managed service backed by Neo4j with its own pricing, SLAs,
and compliance surface. See Zep's own [documentation](https://www.getzep.com/)
for authoritative details on their deployment model.