Igor Lins e Silva
f20a1a30fe
Part of #875. Bring the VitePress site into line with the new README and the reproducibility scorecard: drop category-error comparisons, drop retracted claims, retain only metrics and caveats that survive audit. website/index.md - New tagline matches README (local-first, verbatim, pluggable backend, 96.6% R@5 raw, zero API calls). - Replace the "MemPalace hybrid 100% / Supermemory ~99% / Mastra 94.87% / Mem0 ~85%" comparison table with a single honest table showing MemPalace's own retrieval-recall numbers (raw 96.6%, hybrid v4 held-out 98.4%). Add an explicit sentence explaining why we no longer publish a cross-system table on the landing page (retrieval recall vs QA accuracy are different metrics). - Soften the "ChromaDB-powered vector search" feature blurb to be backend-agnostic, since the retrieval layer is pluggable. website/reference/benchmarks.md - Full rewrite of the retrieval-recall tables. No more "100%" headline; honest held-out 98.4% R@5 replaces it. Added the model-agnostic rerank result (99.2% R@5 / 100% R@10 with minimax-m2.7 via Ollama) to show the pipeline is not Haiku-specific. - Drop the LoCoMo "Hybrid v5 + Sonnet rerank (top-50) 100%" row. With per-conversation session counts of 19-32 and top_k=50, the retrieval stage returns every session by construction — the number measures an LLM's reading comprehension, not retrieval. - Drop the cross-system comparison tables. Link out to each project's own research page (Mastra, Mem0, Supermemory) for their published numbers and metric definitions. - Rewrite reproduction commands to use the correct repository and demonstrate the new --llm-backend ollama flag. website/concepts/the-palace.md - Remove the "+34%" row / paragraph. Wing/room filtering is standard metadata filtering in the vector store, not a novel retrieval mechanism — the April-7 note already retracted that framing; this finishes the retraction on the website where it had remained. website/guide/searching.md - Same treatment for "34% retrieval improvement". Reframe as operational scoping, not a novel boost. website/reference/contributing.md - Update the "palace structure matters" bullet to reflect the same framing: scoping-not-magic. website/concepts/knowledge-graph.md - Replace the MemPalace-vs-Zep feature matrix with a short "related work" note that links to Zep's own documentation for authoritative details on their deployment model. Avoids claims we cannot verify at source.
Caution
Scam alert. The only official sources for MemPalace are this GitHub repository, the PyPI package, and the docs site at mempalaceofficial.com. Any other domain — including
mempalace.tech— is an impostor and may distribute malware. Details and timeline: docs/HISTORY.md.
MemPalace
Local-first AI memory. Verbatim storage, pluggable backend, 96.6% R@5 raw on LongMemEval — zero API calls.
What it is
MemPalace stores your conversation history as verbatim text and retrieves it with semantic search. It does not summarize, extract, or paraphrase. The index is structured — people and projects become wings, topics become rooms, and original content lives in drawers — so searches can be scoped rather than run against a flat corpus.
The retrieval layer is pluggable. The current default is ChromaDB; the
interface is defined in mempalace/backends/base.py
and alternative backends can be dropped in without touching the rest of
the system.
Nothing leaves your machine unless you opt in.
Architecture, concepts, and mining flows: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/the-palace.
Install
pip install mempalace
mempalace init ~/projects/myapp
Quickstart
# Mine content into the palace
mempalace mine ~/projects/myapp # project files
mempalace mine ~/chats/ --mode convos # conversation exports
# Search
mempalace search "why did we switch to GraphQL"
# Load context for a new session
mempalace wake-up
For Claude Code, Gemini CLI, MCP-compatible tools, and local models, see mempalaceofficial.com/guide/getting-started.
Benchmarks
All numbers below are reproducible from this repository with the commands
in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md. Full
per-question result files are committed under benchmarks/results_*.
LongMemEval — retrieval recall (R@5, 500 questions):
| Mode | R@5 | LLM required |
|---|---|---|
| Raw (semantic search, no heuristics, no LLM) | 96.6% | None |
| Hybrid v4, held-out 450q (tuned on 50 dev, not seen during training) | 98.4% | None |
| Hybrid v4 + LLM rerank (full 500) | ≥99% | Any capable model |
The raw 96.6% requires no API key, no cloud, and no LLM at any stage. The hybrid pipeline adds keyword boosting, temporal-proximity boosting, and preference-pattern extraction; the held-out 98.4% is the honest generalisable figure.
The rerank pipeline promotes the best candidate out of the top-20
retrieved sessions using an LLM reader. It works with any reasonably
capable model — we have reproduced it with Claude Haiku, Claude Sonnet,
and minimax-m2.7 via Ollama Cloud (no Anthropic dependency). The gap
between raw and reranked is model-agnostic; we do not headline a "100%"
number because the last 0.6% was reached by inspecting specific wrong
answers, which benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md flags as teaching to the test.
Other benchmarks (full results in benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md):
| Benchmark | Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| LoCoMo (session, top-10, no rerank) | R@10 | 60.3% | 1,986 questions |
| LoCoMo (hybrid v5, top-10, no rerank) | R@10 | 88.9% | Same set |
| ConvoMem (all categories, 250 items) | Avg recall | 92.9% | 50 per category |
| MemBench (ACL 2025, 8,500 items) | R@5 | 80.3% | All categories |
We deliberately do not include a side-by-side comparison against Mem0, Mastra, Hindsight, Supermemory, or Zep. Those projects publish different metrics on different splits, and placing retrieval recall next to end-to-end QA accuracy is not an honest comparison. See each project's own research page for their published numbers.
Reproducing every result:
git clone https://github.com/MemPalace/mempalace.git
cd mempalace
pip install -e ".[dev]"
# see benchmarks/README.md for dataset download commands
python benchmarks/longmemeval_bench.py /path/to/longmemeval_s_cleaned.json
Knowledge graph
MemPalace includes a temporal entity-relationship graph with validity windows — add, query, invalidate, timeline — backed by local SQLite. Usage and tool reference: mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/knowledge-graph.
MCP server
29 MCP tools cover palace reads/writes, knowledge-graph operations, cross-wing navigation, drawer management, and agent diaries. Installation and the full tool list: mempalaceofficial.com/reference/mcp-tools.
Agents
Each specialist agent gets its own wing and diary in the palace.
Discoverable at runtime via mempalace_list_agents — no bloat in your
system prompt:
mempalaceofficial.com/concepts/agents.
Auto-save hooks
Two Claude Code hooks save periodically and before context compression: mempalaceofficial.com/guide/hooks.
Requirements
- Python 3.9+
- A vector-store backend (ChromaDB by default)
- ~300 MB disk for the default embedding model
No API key is required for the core benchmark path.
Docs
- Getting started → mempalaceofficial.com/guide/getting-started
- CLI reference → mempalaceofficial.com/reference/cli
- Python API → mempalaceofficial.com/reference/python-api
- Full benchmark methodology → benchmarks/BENCHMARKS.md
- Release notes → CHANGELOG.md
- Corrections and public notices → docs/HISTORY.md
Contributing
PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.